1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
creekfiend onlybluetalk
protectspock

Obsessed with the idea of being a symbiont’s first host. Gaining pretty much nothing from the process because the only memories it has is of swimming around in a cave. Go worm, give us nothing.

mangogbutchboygirl

new star trek oc: ricky dornt, 18 yr old trill host and his fresh-outta-the-soup symbiont. fresh faced, empty headed, and about to get their shared dick kicked in by the universe

androideyes

This is really funny, but I think another hilarious possibility is if those worms have completely full, dramatic lives in those pools. So the first host would be telling wild stories from their past life like any other joined trill, and people would be like “Woah that’s crazy where could something like that have even happened???” And they’d be like “Oh in the worm pool.”

protectspock

oh my god, I never considered worm drama.

calamitys-child

Literally I know it’s been said before but the way that Aziraphale and Crowley are just… Their entire motivating skillset is that they’re domestic, in love, and would like to avoid doing work as much as possible. “Saved the universe literally entirely because I want to avoid my boss and have a nice dinner with my husband while we chat about our gardening and book collecting hobbies and if everything explodes I’m gonna have to be at work all the time” is the single most relatable character drive I’ve ever heard in my entire life and I’m in love with them for it

Good omens Ineffable husbands
july-19th-club randomfangirl330
quasi-normalcy

Healthy relationships are clearly better in real-life but fucked-up ones are way more dramatically interesting in fiction. In much the same way–indeed, in exactly the same way–that feudal monarchy is a hell of a lot of fun in fantasy and historical fiction novels, but complete shit to actually live under.

quasi-normalcy

Feudal monarchy is so hilarious because it’s just like: “What if we based our entire sociopolitical structure on fucked-up family dynamics?”

q
prose-n-scripts stammed-cleams
homunculus-argument

My favourite harmless prank I've heard of was done by this girl whose dad was a geologist, and they'd go on day hikes with his geologist friends/co-workers and when she got bored on them she'd habitually pick up a random rock and go ask him what it is, and one of them would explain what kind of a rock that is, how it probably got here, and usually some notions of the more unusual features the rock had, if any.

And she had a friend who had once gone on a tourist trip to Iceland and brought back a volcanic rock. So she borrowed the rock and took it with her on the hike, and after two randomly picked up "hey dad what rock is this", she presented the volcanic rock, in the same fashion as all the others.

3 minutes later there are five middle-aged and older men circled around this mysterious rock, all agreeing on what it is, but not why it is. They keep asking her questions, where did she find it? Were there any other rocks around there that looked like it? Was it like this on the ground? People walking past the group try to stretch their necks to see over the geologists' shoulders to see what's the source of such amazement.

And in the end she couldn't take it anymore, burst into laughter and confessed. The geologists agree that it was pretty clever.

feenyxblue

Geologist enrichment

bunjywunjy bunjywunjy

Anonymous asked:

Provide cursed facts about stingrays, please

bunjywunjy answered:

this is what stingray jaws and teeth look like

image
bunjywunjy

image

have you ever put a can of sardines into a hydraulic press?

it's like that.

image
bunjywunjy

SO YEAH this shouldn’t concern you overmuch, because human fingers are VERY MUCH NOT on the menu for stingrays!

that said, accidents can and do happen, so stingray touch tanks really should display the appropriate osha warnings by the feeding stations:

image

petting them is totally fine, though. just make sure you keep tabs on where your fingers are at all times if you’re waving food around in the vicinity of a stingray mouth, so you can tell if you’re missing one right away!

image
bones cursed biology
kingjasnah

the reason sisko was so 🙄🙄🙄 over eddington and dukat desperately trying to become his psychosexual codependent nemesis is cause he already has his starfleet academy vulcan bully who is literally only mentioned in take me out to the holosuite….like sisko remembers the last time he saw solok to the very day but he had to pull up eddington’s personnel file when he went all les mis. sorry ladies he’s taken

i just feel like this is critical sisko information that i shouldve known before s7 jules sorry for resuing a joke i txted u but in my defense it was funny and the ep broke my brain st: ds9 ds9 benjamin sisko isha watches star trek
cosmictuesdays meeedeee
spitblaze

frankly I think a lot more people would be open to postmodern art if we all stopped pretending you had to be very smart to understand it and start acknowledging that the starting point for deriving meaning from it is frequently ‘this is stupid bullshit’

spitblaze

To clarify- it’s not just ‘this is stupid’ and then you’re done, finding the meaning in something that seems meaningless can usually be found by starting with that base feeling, ‘This sucks.’ Okay- why does it suck, specifically?

‘This is just a vaccuum cleaner, it doesn’t belong in a museum’. Okay, follow that thread- why is that weird? Is it the elevation of normal commercial products to be put on a pedestal? Does that sentiment remind you of anything? How does that make you feel?

“This is just splatters, anyone could do this.” Anyone could, couldn’t they? Anyone can create things, anyone can make these movements and gestures. Dancing does the same thing, doesn’t it? How do the splatters imply the artist’s movements? What does it say about them?

“This person made a mobile out of twine, flower pots, and pictures of cats. How is this art?” What mediums do you define as ‘art’? Paint? Marble sculpture? Photos? Why are you so sure that this is what art is? Doesn’t this remind you of the kind of crafts a child would make, or maybe a first-time DIYer? Is that intentional? Does the construction or material evoke any other emotions?

This isn’t an end-all be-all, of course- among many other things, there’s postmodern art that’s just for a show of mastery, there’s art that’s commenting on a very certain time in history or about something within the art community you may not be privy to, and there’s art that’s simply about creating and the creative process. It’s hard to approach a full narrative with just a single sentiment. This can’t cover every single topic, obviously.

That being said, it’s just as important to note that in many cases, there’s no wrong answers in art or interpretation. If your takeaway is completely different from the artist, as long as you don’t try to insist that the artist has no real say over their work’s meaning, that’s totally fine. A large part of non-representational art is reliant on emotions, and emotions are informed by your experience as a human being. Your interpretation is just as right as anyone else’s. And you don’t even have to LIKE everything- I hate Jeff Koons and his stupid balloon dogs! Cremaster makes me incredibly uncomfortable and even if that’s the point it’s still uncomfortable enough that it makes me not like it! You can just not like certain art, it’s not all-or-nothing it’s good or it’s not.

TL;DR- if you have a hard time ‘getting’ art, try listening to your base reaction to what you’re looking at, and then ask yourself why it makes you feel that way, and why it’s constructed the way it is.

writing and what not