piplupcola asked:
Hi Mr Gaiman, the children's literature class I'm taking is doing a banned book week and teaching us about reasons why people end up getting their books banned. One of the common reasons was because an author, despite doing their research, wrote about something they personally did not experience (ie a white person writing children's books teaching them about the history of MLK, or making their protagonists disabled when they personally never experienced it)
What do you think about this? Do you think people should only write about things that they personally experienced (like only write what you know) or should everyone be free to write anything as long as they did their research?
I think whoever told you that didn’t do their research on why books are banned and on what books get banned. Here’s the ALA, who run banned books week, and keep track of that sort of thing.
https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/statistics
They do visual guides to what challenges were received and what was being challenged and what the top ten most challenged books were – here are a couple of the most recent up on that site…







