1. peekadora liked this
  2. fourth-axis liked this
  3. pmfji reblogged this from prudencepaccard
  4. pmfji liked this
  5. cricket-on-the-moon liked this
  6. jennybobenny73 reblogged this from tygermama
  7. vaguepositivity liked this
  8. random-nexus liked this
  9. xethatthouknowestthine liked this
  10. steejie liked this
  11. steejie reblogged this from tygermama
  12. sightseeinginskyrim reblogged this from tygermama
  13. lilbunnifufu liked this
  14. madebymoko liked this
  15. rob-anybody liked this
  16. marbleglove liked this
  17. marvinetta liked this
  18. tygermama reblogged this from everbright-mourning
  19. everbright-mourning reblogged this from bobcatmoran
  20. everbright-mourning liked this
  21. moonsplits reblogged this from aikroa
  22. moonsplits liked this
  23. gunsli-01 liked this
  24. gunsli-01 reblogged this from apatchworkstar
  25. cloudytomboy reblogged this from gogglesque
  26. apatchworkstar reblogged this from danidanidanica
  27. drilnos liked this
  28. danidanidanica reblogged this from alopexplasma
  29. gwathdring said: Or if we’re talking about stuff like raw data. X was observed and then Y was observed. But at soon as you start slipping into describing structures you’re physically, socially, culturally or cognitively a part of … you’re no longer a third party and objectivity is out the window and we’re back to the above. Which is rather a lot of science.
  30. gwathdring said: Fair enough. :) For me it very much comes down to not being able to define a system from within itself. We can create a scafolding that approximates definition and we have to, at some point, be satisfied with that. Objectivity is fine as a concept as long as, deep down, it isn’t really about objectivity *in opposition to subjectivity* but rather structure objectivity in opposition to casual observation.
  31. luxuriant-radish reblogged this from prudencepaccard
  32. luxuriant-radish liked this
  33. ssenevitaerc reblogged this from prudencepaccard
  34. gwathdring liked this
  35. couthon liked this
  36. prudencepaccard reblogged this from gwathdring and added:
    This is a very good point about the pitfalls of objectivity as a concept. I think I was reacting to what that person was...
  37. chzva reblogged this from studiednonchalance
  38. gwathdring reblogged this from prudencepaccard and added:
    I don’t think relying on the word objective to defend properly executed science is a good idea.Properly performed...
  39. aikroa reblogged this from rohansleepover
  40. shortlifelongart liked this
  41. whythou liked this
  42. pentachord liked this
  43. chihuannabe liked this
  44. rohansleepover reblogged this from gogglesque
  45. sasukeathooters liked this
  46. kuttithevangu posted this