Could Nature’s 2-year torrent of paper retractions be a good thing?
The Flood The last two years at Nature Magazine have seen a surprising wave of paper retractions. In 2013 and now just so far in 2014, Nature has retracted a total of 14 papers. How unusual is that?Historically, Nature retracts relatively few papers, perhaps just under two per year on average.
What the heck has been going on in 2013-2014?
Let’s break it down.
…gaaaaaaaaaaame…
Anyway I am so obsessed with the aai mangas you have no idea. In particular for Gumshoe and Edgeworth’s dynamic
*so quiet you can barely hear me*
Do you sell wet cookies....
I just woke up.
Why is this on my dashboard.
the types of media i like can be placed in one of two categories:
type 1: oh my god this thing is amazing, i love it, i could go on hours long rants about how well executed it was. it has its faults but overall it's excellent.
type 2: i didn't say it was good, i said i liked it
Type 1:
Type 2:
Rlly hope my shadow version: they/heflop is doing well xx
Bold of you to assume I'm the shadow version 🙄
ten years of fighting and when shit hits the fan tumblr instantly has reddit’s back. the greatest enemies to lovers story ever told.
you understand
Oops, my hand slipped–
humanizations of websites have returned. nature is healing, capitalism is the virus
THE FANART
esperata
ramenflavoredchaos
Luigi, watching the news: Someone tried to fight a squid at the aquarium today!
Bowser: walks in covered with ink Well, maybe the squid was being a dick.
